Being With Yourself: Lessons in Lone Ranging

02/11/10  Print This Post Print This Post    11 Comments   Popular   Written by Colette Bernhardt
  • Stumble It
  • Share

Photo by author

Spending Valentine’s Day alone need not be a horrible depressing ordeal. Instead, it can be rejuvenating and liberating.

Singletons. If you fancy eating out this Sunday, don’t bother. Restaurants everywhere will be dispensing with their normal menus and serving overpriced, five-course dinners to twosomes, many of whom will be joined at hip and lip. Yes, Valentine’s Day approaches, and with it the grim stench of solitude for all us unattached people. No wonder they call it VD.

But what if we stopped believing the endless hype churned out by ad agencies and dating websites? What if we consider that being by ourselves can actually be enjoyable?

Beyond the Marketing Campaign

One-person homes are now more common than ever, comprising 27% of US households and 29% of UK households. Still, the media message blares forth: Happiness comes not only from having a long-term partner, but also by continually surrounding yourself with a fabulous array of friends. Sites like Facebook and Twitter make it virtually impossible to entirely escape other humans.

With these thoughts in mind, I join 21 others for the simply titled How To Be Alone workshop at London’s School of Life. The School of Life includes a new bookshop and social enterprise with the aim of teaching attendees “all the things you never learned at school” through lectures, discussions, meals and trips, all of which delve voraciously into philosophy, art and psychology.

Photo by Jurijus Azanovas

No One Wants To Be Stuck Alone With A Boiled Egg

Leading the session is Naomi Alderman, award-winning novelist and a convert to single living after years of feeling terrified of being alone. Once she left her door always unlocked so she could always come home to friends (or burglars). Now she appreciates the delights of solitude espoused by such luminary loners as the 19th century writer Thoreau, who spent two years by himself in a Massachusetts forest, discovering he has “never found the companion that was so companionable as solitude”.

In medieval Britain, almost every village had either a hermit — usually male and living out in the sticks — or a recluse, generally female and stationed at the edge of a neighborhood. Quiet and content in their stillness, these lone dwellers were considered deeply wise and often divine.

But, explains Naomi, this changed in the 1500s with the closing of the monasteries and the rise of Protestantism. Seen as a relic of Catholicism, hermits were now eyed with suspicion and linked to dark forces. To a degree, this stigma still continues today, with solitary individuals frequently viewed as weirdos, even serial killers in the making.

Thankfully, no one at the workshop appears notably murderous, and when Naomi asks us to form small groups for discussion, it seems we solo types have a lot to say. One woman imagines that everyone else in London is having a ball while she is “stuck at home with a boiled egg.” Another confesses to frequently telling her friends she is busy, when in fact she just wants an evening to herself doing nothing.

Being Alone Vs Being Lonely

Everyone agrees that being alone and being lonely are entirely different things. One is forced upon us. The other is a choice. If you spend Saturday night alone watching a DVD because that’s what you want. Great! If it’s because you’ve had no other offers. Not so great.

Photo by Only Sequel

Naomi encourages us to contemplate the potential benefits of solitude: creativity, inner peace and an increased affinity with nature. She then suggests activities for improving our ability to be alone, including meditation, gardening, and visiting a restaurant by ourselves. There are several protests over this last one. Apparently a table for one still serves as the icon for alone-without-choice.

Naomi also emphasizes the importance of making new friends and proposes numerous ways of doing so in order to spend at least some of our time with others:

“Knowing that you can do solitude and socializing makes each one better.”

Indeed, as with so much of life, the answer lies in balance. There’ will be times when aloneness, as Californian author Anneli Rufus puts it, provides “just what we need, the way tuna need the sea”, and isolation can be truly splendid. There will also be those times we need the comfort and stimulation of other human beings around us.

As we shuffle out the School of Life’s cosy lecture room, a number of us decide to move onto the pub, but we won’t forget what we learned tonight. We are independent spirits. This weekend, we won’t give a monkey’s what those couples are doing as we head to our favorite restaurant with a single-seat table to people watch or read a book or simply enjoy the meal as we dine alone
.

COMMUNITY CONNECTION

Embrace the solo spirit with Michaela Lola’s Solo Travel: 6 Reasons to Wander Alone


  • Stumble It
  • Share

About the Author

Matador ID: colette-bernhardt

Colette Bernhardt is a British freelance journalist based in Brighton, England. She also writes for The Guardian, The Times and The Independent. She has visited Nepal and Namibia, but is most exhilarated by cycling 25 minutes from her house to walk on the chalky hills of the South Downs.

More By This Author

11 Comments... join the discussion!

  • Turner replied on February 11, 2010

    Sorry, but I don’t buy any of this; being alone (not lonely) is just the progression of what started as loneliness. Everything that follows is just an excuse, padding if you will, to compensate for someone who isn’t there. Nothing will fill the space meant for him or her.

    At the same time, can’t blame you for trying. I’ve been there. Still am.

    (Report comment)

    ↵ Reply
    • Leigh Shulman replied to Turner on February 11, 2010

      Turner,

      I come to this from the opposite perspective. I am NEVER alone. Ever. Unless you mean an hour by myself in the house before Lila or Noah get home. Or one of LIla’s friends comes over. Or sitting in a coffee shop working.

      And that is not really alone.

      So I don’t really see this as an excuse. It simply means you enjoy your time with just you. That you don’t need another person in order to find meaning in life or in that dinner by yourself.

      (Report comment)

      ↵ Reply
  • Candice Walsh replied on February 11, 2010

    I don’t think Colette necessarily means you have to be alone forever. For the time being, I’m totally fine with being alone. I dig the fact I can do whatever the hell I want, when I want. With that being said, if the right fellow happened to come along, I’d be all for getting involved.

    I think being able to be independent will ultimately lead you to that right person anyway. Keeps us form jumping into lousy relationships with idiots. And then again this article isn’t necessarily about “love” either. Sometimes we all need a day or two away from friends.

    That being said, I wish my mother would understand this concept and stop accusing me of being a lesbian.

    (Report comment)

    ↵ Reply
    • Turner replied to Candice Walsh on February 11, 2010

      If it’s a temporary condition, then I retract my previous statement.

      (Report comment)

      ↵ Reply
      • Candice Walsh replied to Turner on February 11, 2010

        Oh man. Let’s hope it’s temporary.

        (Report comment)

        ↵ Reply
  • Robyn replied on February 11, 2010

    Hi,
    And even if it’s not temporary, that doesn’t have to be a problem – IF one likes being alone – obviously. I adore my solitude. Thrive on it, but I know that’s not the norm. I can get people time whenever I want it because I have several close long-term friends and some new kindred spirits in my life. Intimacy is so nice when it’s authentic and mutual with a great connection. But waiting for that to happen or spending too much time looking for it is not worth sacrificing quality alone time, imho.
    I still believe in serendipity.

    (Report comment)

    ↵ Reply
    • Leigh Shulman replied to Robyn on February 12, 2010

      That’s a great point, Robyn.

      Some people do prefer being single and not having the so-called life partner. A good friend of mine feels this way. For years, her family and friends have pressured her, tried to set her up with people, asked if, asked if she’s a lesbian and then tried to set her up with women.

      Finally, I asked her if she actually wanted to get married or have a committed partner. She stopped, thought and while and then told me that I was the first person who had ever asked that question.

      It’s so often assumed that we must.

      (Report comment)

      ↵ Reply
      • Robyn replied to Leigh Shulman on February 12, 2010

        No doubt she appreciated your sensitivity to that aspect. I would have too.

        (Report comment)

        ↵ Reply
  • Alouise replied on February 14, 2010

    Great article. For me Valentine’s day is just another day. I think it’s nice to have a day to celebrate love and whatnot, but really if you love someone – shouldn’t you show it every day? Valentine’s always seems a bit cheesy to me, with pink teddy bears and chocolate hearts… maybe it’s cause I’m always single on Valentine’s day. If you’re assuming I’m jaded or cynical about it, I’m not. It is what it is. I’m not looking for love and I’m not expecting it to find me. I’m content with myself and I quite enjoy being single. For Valentine’s this year I’m celebrating by going to dinner with a friend and then watching Avatar. Being a single girl on Valentine’s doesn’t mean I have to make a date with Ben & Jerry’s and Jack Daniels.

    (Report comment)

    ↵ Reply
  • Charlie Claw's - Wasini Island replied on February 25, 2010

    although it’s important for people to be able to get by in this world alone, it is satisfying when you can do it with others or someone special (in the case of a relationship).
    i think parents need to foster independence in their children so that they don’t grow up feeling needy.

    regarding VDay, it’s all about marketing ($) and less about love. my 2 cents.

    Cheers!

    Sally & Steve Mullens, and the cheery Charlie Claw’s team

    (Report comment)

    ↵ Reply
  • Ken replied on February 25, 2010

    As a freak magnet too wise to pair up with the loony tunes that have come my way, I adapted to solitude rather than succumb to desperation and eventual miserable company. When (or if) the right person comes along, then I’ll pair up. Until then, I’m quite content.

    (Report comment)

    ↵ Reply

Leave a Comment

Get Matador in your inbox and around the web.

Sign up for our FREE weekly newsletter.


View full list of RSS feeds

Jump To Category:


Travel Insurance.




Popular Stories on Matador

10 Constants of Air Travel

... 

The Best Condiments in the World Right Now

Tzakiki combines puréed cucumber and strained yoghurt ... 

Travel vs The Internet

Jacob Bielanski asks, "Does the internet cheapen your t... 

Bariloche Juxtaposition

"I think about how Nazis³ used to live here and probab... 

Matador member to watch: Gabriela Garcia

"I’m constantly amazed at how few places, cultures, o... 

Engrish Spoken Here

... 

Introducing the Matador Store

Pick up a t-shirt and send us shots of you exploring th... 

Diving Deeply Into the Joy Of Deliberate Living

Do you choose your life or does your life choose you? T... 

Peyote Perception: Searching For Truth In The Mexican Desert

Dani Redd ingests the 'heart of the earth' and relates ... 

Kaffir Lime, Candy Canes & Almond Joy: 10 Alternative Martinis

The martini might be the most loosely defined drink in ... 



Focus



Editor Blogs